Talk:Dagr/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Not as good as the other two I reviewed today, due to some prose issues. though well within the bounds of GA. I've done a few copyedits to fix the major problems, and think it should be fine now, but I'd suggest a good copyedit.

As all criteria other than the minor prose issues met, I don't think it's necessary to relist them here. Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 01:45, 6 October 2008 (UTC)