Jump to content

Talk:Danie Mellor/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)

This article meets the GA criteria in my opinion.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    I fixed a few things.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Everything's cited, assuming accurate.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    Looks good.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    One image, no problem.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Pass, good work. —Noisalt (talk) 00:02, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Why the heck was this article used as a featured article? It's about an artist and it only has one very small low quality image at the bottom of the page. Just curious. I thought the standards for featured articles were much higher... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ferdaw (talkcontribs) 00:01, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]