Jump to content

Talk:Daniel E. Barbey/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:35, 25 July 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
    Disambiguate APD and put parentheses around it or something.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    It's not clear why Beach Parties are a big deal. Is there a link or something you can reference? He was obviously married, do you have any more details about when or any children?
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
  1. The Beach parties represented a conflict between doctrine in FTP167 and reality. It illustrates the changes made to doctrine.
    I've redlinked Beach Party as I think some more context is needed to explain the doctrine.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:34, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  2. My sources have no more details on his family.
  3. Unlinked the APD link.