Talk:Danika (film)

Plot is an opinion piece

I can't help but notice, reading the plot for this direct to dvd film that almost half of it seems to be the opinion the person writing the plot section had about the film. This part of the plot has no place on wikipedia imo. Even in the reception section, it would have to be relevant opinions by critics, not by an anonymous wikipedia editor.--Die-yng (talk) 00:00, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Danika. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070703150152/http://www.sdff.org:80/awardwinners.html to http://www.sdff.org/awardwinners.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:06, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]