Talk:David Arquette in World Championship Wrestling/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 17:45, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I'll be taking a look at this article for the January 2022 GAN backlog drive. If you haven't already signed up, please feel free to join in! Although QPQ is not required, if you're feeling generous, I also have a list of GA nominations of my own right here.

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Lede

Link professional wrestling in first sentence
"the film's distributors Warner Bros." → "Warner Bros., who were distributing the film,"
Should probably name the "rivals in the wrestling industry"
"he would be involved with" → "with which he would be involved"
Period rather than semicolon after "wrestling's worst moments" and add a comma after "additionally"

Background

"hesitant over" → "hesitant about" or "hesitant towards"
"would not be" → "would not have been" (I assume that this insistence came after the negative reception)

Storyline

Comma after "April 12, 2000" per MOS:DATECOMMA
Comma after "tag-team match against Jarrett and Eric Bischoff"

Legacy

"making back only half"
"being covered" → "receiving coverage"

References

While MOS:NOTES does say that explanatory footnotes and citations can be combined into one section, I do think it looks awkward and they would benefit from being split

General comments

Images are properly licensed and relevant
No stability concerns in the revision history
Earwig score looks good

Putting on hold now to allow nominator to address comments. Feel free to ping me with questions, and let me know when you're finished. — Ghost River 22:09, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking the time to review this. I believe I have addressed everything above, here are the changes involved. I hope this article was not difficult to follow--I know professional wrestling has a lot of inside-baseball jargon and I'm hoping to take this article further so if anything was unclear please let me know. ᵹʀᴀᴘᴘʟᴇ ꭗ 15:27, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for making those changes! I actually know a decent amount of wrestling jargon, as I had a lot of lung infections and stomach bugs around the ages of 8-13, and when I had to stay home from school, reruns of old WWE matches were always on TV. That and Gangland. In any case, passing now! — Ghost River 16:51, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Much appreciated, thank you again. ᵹʀᴀᴘᴘʟᴇ ꭗ 18:01, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]