Talk:Denny Bautista/GA3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sportsguy17 (talk · contribs) 00:07, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello again. I am so sorry to do this, but this article is probably going to have to be a quick-fail. First of all, its very disorganized with headings, etc. It should be like your other creations (ex. Barry Zito), where it should be that teams are in a Level 3 headings and years are in a Level 4 heading and I see no Level 4 headings. It covers absolutely nothing of his college career or his current family. The thing about his relationship with Martinez belongs in the personal life section down toward the bottom of the article. Another thing is I see a lack of info about his 2012 season. Was he injured, did he not play, or did he? Unless these concerns can be addressed, I'm afraid I'll have to fail this article. Sportsguy17 (TC) 00:07, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Please don't quick-fail this; I'll be happy to make the changes you want. As you can see, I have made several already. Unfortunately, there don't appear to be stats available for Bautista in 2012 see here. I can't figure out what happened to him that year, and I was surprised to get any Korean stats for him at all, as those are usually unavailable. I hope that issue won't lead to this article getting failed. Also, Bautista did not attend college, so the lack of info on his college career was deliberate. I've done articles about players who did not attend college before, and that did not seem to be a problem. :) Sanfranciscogiants17 (talk) 15:00, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

@Sanfranciscogiants17: - Its alright, I'm not going to quick fail this. The fact is you addressed my concerns, making me likely to pass this article. Let me look it over a little more, but I find it very likely that this will pass. Sportsguy17 (TC) 18:21, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality, no copyvios, spelling and grammar:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

You were diligent in making the needed changes for this to pass. I loved reading about his Minor League career and the article in general. It is a privilege to be able to review another one of your brilliant works. Let me know if you ever have another GA nominee that you'd like for me to review. Sportsguy17 (TC) 18:24, 21 February 2014 (UTC)