Talk:Did It On'em/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hahc21 (talk · contribs) 20:21, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Hahc!--(CA)Giacobbe (talk) 20:38, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

First comments

Following, minor edits I made:

Lead too long for a single paragraph. Split into three. (done)
I uploaded the cover for the single.
Fixed that charts section.
Italized the album title on 'credits and personnel'
Split the paragraph on 'reception', too long.
Added quotation marks to "best rapping"

Comments

Music video

"Director DJ Scoob Doo revealed to MTV News" ... "In an interview with MTV News on May 31, 2011,"

The first appearance of MTV News should be wikilinked, not the last. Also, it is mentioned twice too closely, creating a redundant use of the word. Finally, the second says "In an interview with" and the first "revealed to". Better if the order is swapped.

"The video..." ... "The video was directed" >> "It was directed" (avoid redundancy)
"The video additionally" >> "Additionally, the clip features..." or "Additionally, it features Minaj"
"Minaj said that the video was a way of saying thanks to her fans" >> "Minaj stated the video was a gesture of gratitude to her fans" sounds better?

Nothing else to note by now. —Hahc 21 02:16, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All have been completed, anything else?--(CA)Giacobbe (talk) 20:31, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, nothing else.

Verdict

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

—Hahc 21 02:25, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.