Talk:DirectCompute

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Microsoft Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Microsoft Windows: Computing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft Windows, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microsoft Windows on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Microsoft WindowsWikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsTemplate:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsMicrosoft Windows articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

GPGPU is hardly a new concept; a much shorter introductory example (or none) with a reference to GPGPU would be appropriate. The current text makes it sound like Microsoft invented GPU processing. Actually, the entire article sounds like marketing copy. --Devnevyn (talk) 22:59, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Example code[edit]

Some example code, like in OpenCL, would be useful.
An example that could be written simply in idiomatic code for both languages might be even better.
Sm18 (talk) 20:44, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NO IMPLEMENATATION[edit]

I ve seen no implementation of this technology in commercial software . Is it a viable alternative to CUDA or vaporware ?

16:03, 1 February 2013 (UTC)~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.5.134.180 (talk)