Talk:DirectDraw

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Microsoft Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft Windows, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microsoft Windows on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Microsoft WindowsWikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsTemplate:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsMicrosoft Windows articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

"DirectDraw is now replaced by Direct2D."

Are there any references to support this? My understanding was that Direct2D is meant as a replacement for GDI, not DirectDraw. In particular:

Direct2D does not support full screen (except on Windows 8).^[1]
Direct2D has primitives for drawing lines, circles, etc. using textured brushes.^[2]
Direct2D supports high-quality (but slow) typography, preferebly with the aid of DirectWrite.^[3] In fact, if you draw text without DirectWrite, Direct2D will use it internally. ^[4]
Direct2D does not give you direct access to the frame buffer, at least not as far as I can tell.
Direct2D doesn't provide accurate access to the pixels; it provides "device independent pixels" which are then scaled to match the actual hardware. ^[5]

Compare to the features for DirectDraw:

Bit-block transfers (blits)
Page flipping and multiple back buffers
Overlays, which is placing one image surface over another on the video display
Alpha source over destination blending, which is blending two surfaces using the source alpha image component
Video YUV pixel formats and color conversion
Direct video access to the frame buffer

Quoted from Microsoft.^[6]

References:

Well, I guess it's wrong then. Feel free to correct. — Frεcklεfσσt | Talk 17:28, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]