Talk:Doleserpeton
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Classification section
[edit]I think the whole Classification section needs to be deleted on the grounds of WP:FRINGE. A single cladistic analysis is not sufficiently notable to warrant mention in an encyclopedia unless it's the only one ever done for the taxon in question, and even then it should be kept brief. Phylogeny is determined by scientific consensus, not by a single study. Furthermore, most the section is devoted to the Lissamphibia question, not to Doleserpeton. Zyxwv99 (talk) 01:27, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class amphibian and reptile articles
- Low-importance amphibian and reptile articles
- C-Class amphibian and reptile articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles articles
- C-Class Palaeontology articles
- Low-importance Palaeontology articles
- C-Class Palaeontology articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Palaeontology articles