Jump to content

Talk:Drosera anglica/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Reassessment

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
This article is being reassessed as part of the GA Sweeps. Juniper§ Liege (TALK) 16:23, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):
    • Made minor edits.
    b (MoS):
    • Minor edits to conform with MOS.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    • Reference 6 broken. As the reference was cited only once - and then as a second reference to a fact, I have removed it rather than trying to find a replacement.
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    • Reliable sources.
    c (OR):
    • No evidence of OR
  3. It is broad in its scope.
    a (major aspects):
    • Adequate.
    b (focused)
    • Adequate.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    • No POV issues.
  5. It is stable.
    • No edit wars etc.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: Pass Juniper§ Liege (TALK) 16:45, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]