Talk:Drosera anglica/GA1
Appearance
GA Reassessment
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
This article is being reassessed as part of the GA Sweeps. ✽ Juniper§ Liege (TALK) 16:23, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
- Made minor edits.
- b (MoS):
- Minor edits to conform with MOS.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
- Reference 6 broken. As the reference was cited only once - and then as a second reference to a fact, I have removed it rather than trying to find a replacement.
- b (citations to reliable sources):
- Reliable sources.
- c (OR):
- No evidence of OR
- a (references):
- It is broad in its scope.
- a (major aspects):
- Adequate.
- b (focused)
- Adequate.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
-
- No POV issues.
-
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail: Pass
✽ Juniper§ Liege (TALK) 16:45, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: Pass