Talk:EOKA B

Hate article, not giving a truthful and complete picture, usage against the republic of Cyprus, and non-neutral point of view

This is a plain hate article against EOKA B. It does not portray the organization from a neutral point of view. In addition the article is used against the republic of Cyprus. All well sourced information, and the previous well sourced and truthful version of it, was deleted in a single edit, with no discussion on what so ever and it came up with this.

Untitled

eoka was a terorist group and they were killing Turks. Thats why Turkish Army invased north cyprus and before turkish invasion, eoka invased cyprus. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.45.158.241 (talk) 14:19, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

?

This is a good and neutral reference. This should be used in article to ensure NPOV. Also, there should be some information about the orginaziaton's role in the intercommunal violence in the article. --Seksen iki yüz kırk beş (talk) 12:08, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Crimes against humanity of EOKA B

Will there be a section of Crimes against humanity of EOKA B? There are many committed against Turkish Cypriots? Terrorist actions of EOKA B are well known and proved.--Baris365 (talk) 12:46, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Baris365: Why wont you add them, with a suitable source? Cinadon36 13:26, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Cinadon36: Why you stalking my comments and asking same boring questions? Who you are, who do you think you are? A repressentative of EOKA B?

No, I am a WP user. I am not stalking your comments, I was watching this Talk page and Talk:Bloody Christmas (1963) pages since I have edited the articles in the past. Thanks for asking though. Cinadon36 06:21, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, you are stalking and writing the same things to me. Everyone is WP user here. You are not suppose to write to everyone who edits or writes new topic here. Have a good day.--Baris365 (talk) 08:34, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]