Talk:East and West Blockhouses/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ian Rose (talk · contribs) 08:59, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 08:59, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Toolbox checks -- no dab/EL issues.

Structure -- logical/standard for this type of article.

Prose/content

Copyedited as usual, pls let me know any concerns.
"The West Blockhouse was destroyed in the 19th century..." -- "destroyed" sounds like a natural disaster or act of war, would "demolished" be more appropriate?
Following on, there are no visible remains of the West Blockhouse then?

Sources -- appear reliable and suitably formatted.

Images -- no licensing issues.

Another nice addition to the Device Fort series -- just a couple of points before I pass it, Hc. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 11:25, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers! Changes made as suggested. I think we're on the home straight now for the Device Forts... not that many left to get up to GA! :) Hchc2009 (talk) 17:49, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Great -- passing this one. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 22:49, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]