This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
I think that this article satisfy the notability guidelines:
it is a W3C draft about an important subject in the XML technology: the definition of a binary XML format
there are a lot of companies in the working group: Siemens, Fujitsu, Sun Microsystems, Intel, Nokia, Adobe, IBM, etc... which shows the importance of the subject for these companies. Hervegirod 21:15, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
I agree. I'm removing the notice. —Pengo 22:54, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Note that it was added before the first draft was published and at a very early stage of the article  —Pengo 23:35, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Encoding and decoding speeds are both improved with Efficient XML
Please elaborate on how EXI compares to other solutions, such as XMill, XGrind or XQueC. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 12:06, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
Why was most implementations removed? Including every C/C++ implementation?
This makes EXI seam disadvantageous compared to other Binary XML formats that have more listed implementations.
Also the text was changed stating that two implementations exist, which is not true. I do understand that Wikipedia is not a dictionary, but this statement makes me think that the other implementations was removed by some other reason. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) 17:04, 3 November 2011 (UTC)