Talk:Enchylium conglomeratum/GA1
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Xkalponik (talk · contribs)
Reviewer: Wolverine XI (talk · contribs) 08:46, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Comments
[edit]Reviewing this now. Wolverine XI (talk to me) 08:46, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Wolverine XI, Thanks. I'll be co-operating throughout.
Let me know your suggestions/opinions.Thanks for the suggestions. I'll address them promptly. X (talk) 09:36, 23 March 2024 (UTC)- @Wolverine XI, I think I've addressed most of your suggestions. However, I couldn't expand the chemistry section as the spot tests yielded negative results, there's not much room for details regarding these. I searched for a long time but couldn't find suitable info to be added in that section. But other than that I think it's better now. I fixed capitalization, started each para by species name, rewrote phrases, fixed disambiguation link, rearranged sections, expanded taxonomy, and other sections, and removed unnecessary headers. Let me know if there's more to be done. Thanks.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Xkalponik (talk • contribs)
- OH, I see. Promoting now. Wolverine XI (talk to me) 14:37, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Wolverine XI, I think I've addressed most of your suggestions. However, I couldn't expand the chemistry section as the spot tests yielded negative results, there's not much room for details regarding these. I searched for a long time but couldn't find suitable info to be added in that section. But other than that I think it's better now. I fixed capitalization, started each para by species name, rewrote phrases, fixed disambiguation link, rearranged sections, expanded taxonomy, and other sections, and removed unnecessary headers. Let me know if there's more to be done. Thanks.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Xkalponik (talk • contribs)
Review
[edit]- Dotted Jelly Lichen Any reason for the capitalisation?
- Start each paragraph by indicating the species name
- features common lecanorine apothecia Features and common don't go well together.
- sessile Is an orange link.
- that is entire and smooth. What does this mean?
- Can you expand chemistry? There are many available sources.
- Taxonomy should be moved above description
- Please remove the unsourced synonyms section
- You have to expand taxonomy; it's way too short.
- This article is small, it doesn't need a further reading. Please use those sources as well
- Pls remove 4th level header North America (NatureServe)
I am done. Wolverine XI (talk to me) 09:05, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Xkalponik: If you are done, please indicate so. Wolverine XI (talk to me) 13:35, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.