Talk:Encyclopedia of Pseudoscience
|WikiProject Resource Exchange|
I should note that I could find only a negative review of the book. The only other comment I could find says "Whatever you do, don't waste your money on William Williams Encyclopedia of Pseudoscience", but I did not see any reason to include it. --Iantresman 23:18, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
- Well, maybe the book isn't notable enough to have its own article. Bubba73 (talk), 23:22, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
- Perhaps it's notable because it doesn't appear to be very good. I think I'd be interested to find that out about the book. --Iantresman 08:10, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
I second the nomination to remove this article
Wikipedia already has an excellent article on pseudoscience. Don't really need an article about a book that is basically a tabloid treatment of the subject, much less one that doesn't reference related articles.