Talk:Enterprise Architecture Body of Knowledge
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Review
[edit]Can somebody do some peer review please David.t.bath 03:41, 6 November 2006.
![]() | This article appears to contain a large number of buzzwords. |
article reads like a book review
[edit]This article does not deal with the topic of the EABOK as much as it is a review of the EABOK (why it is a "good" thing. This indicates serious wiki style issues. The article needs a major rewrite. I will take a crack at this in the coming weeks. Nickmalik (talk) 20:21, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
dead links
[edit]following up on the single commercial citation, the link appears to be dead and there is no current reference to the EABOK on the website. It appears that the EABOK may be a dead project for the company in question and therefore does this page still have relevance? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.240.128.75 (talk) 06:16, 22 October 2012 (UTC)