Jump to content

Talk:Epistemic modal logic

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

weak

[edit]

Epistemic modal logic is so weak, can anyone find a justification for it? It seems so screwed it isn't even worth mentioning. I'll even count a vague endorsement by some contemporary logician. Just give me something--Heyitspeter (talk) 11:33, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently Jaakko Hintikka does work on this.--Heyitspeter (talk) 04:16, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Negative introspection axiom

[edit]

In the article, the english description doesn't seem to fit the formal definition ... there seems to be a K missing. 92.230.66.116 (talk) 11:16, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

problems-section

[edit]

the citation source for No 3 is no longer there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.172.165.48 (talk) 11:44, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]