Talk:Every Mother Counts (album)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Carbrera (talk · contribs) 21:05, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Initial comments
[edit]- You should include an alt for the album cover image
- Done. ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:48, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- Any information on when the album was recorded?
- Not based on my research. I assume the album's liner notes may have more information, but I don't have access to them. I even tried finding the "Every Mother Counts" albums in my local library system's database but they are not part of its collection. ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:48, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- Generally, "healthcare" is two words
- Done. ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:48, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- I would perhaps add the release year in front of the film like "Turlington's 2010 documentary film..."
- "The album is the first in Starbucks' series of the same name; Every Mother Counts 2012 was released the following year." --> There should be a citation at the end of every paragraph/section
- Done. ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:48, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- "who also served as music supervisor" --> "who also served as the music supervisor" (Does this make sense?)
- I'm not sure the "the" is necessary, and since this wasn't corrected or pointed out during the Guild of Copy Editors review, I'm tempted to leave the wording as is, unless you feel strongly otherwise. ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:48, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- I can't say for sure, but typically there is a citation after every quote, so there should be one after "[suit] her voice"
- Done. ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:48, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- Reference #6: "CBS Seattle" should be linked to "KIRO-TV"
- Done. ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:48, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- ON HOLD – a very good article Another Believer! Please ping me when you have completed making any changes. Regards, Carbrera (talk) 21:35, 16 January 2017 (UTC).
- @Carbrera: I've addressed all of your concerns, with the exception of the addition to "the". Please let me know if further changes are needed. Thank you for your time and assistance, and only if you're interested, I've also nominated Every Mother Counts 2012 for Good article status if you are looking for another review or a similar subject. ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:48, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Another Believer: – Thanks for addressing them so quickly. I also changed the title of the chronology for a better fit, but are you free to undo this action if you disagree. Thank you. Btw, I was surprised to see you nominated "Start a War" for a copyedit; any future plans regarding it?. Thanks, Carbrera (talk) 21:55, 16 January 2017 (UTC).
- @Carbrera: Your edit is fine, thank you. Re: "Start a War", I've just gotten in the habit of nominating potential GAs and promoted GAs for a copy edit. I can have 3 requests in the Guild of Copy Editors queue, most often for articles I've expanded myself, but sometimes for other articles I've had my eye on. I hope you don't mind! I think it's always a good thing to have a copy edit review for quality articles. Thanks again for this review! ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:01, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Another Believer: – Thanks for addressing them so quickly. I also changed the title of the chronology for a better fit, but are you free to undo this action if you disagree. Thank you. Btw, I was surprised to see you nominated "Start a War" for a copyedit; any future plans regarding it?. Thanks, Carbrera (talk) 21:55, 16 January 2017 (UTC).
- @Carbrera: I've addressed all of your concerns, with the exception of the addition to "the". Please let me know if further changes are needed. Thank you for your time and assistance, and only if you're interested, I've also nominated Every Mother Counts 2012 for Good article status if you are looking for another review or a similar subject. ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:48, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.