Talk:Extended Graphics Array

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Filling out page

I didn't realize a prior attempt by 4throck had been blanked a couple years ago by Onel5969 on the grounds that the redirect target covered it better. I have made my own attempt at an article here. There are several books and publications which mention XGA, and I do not think it is covered adequately at Graphics display resolution#XGA. I've tried to provide good information on how this is different from an 8514/A. I think it is a historically important GPU deserving and article and that this should be here. —DIYeditor (talk) 03:27, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If there is any question, check what links here... —DIYeditor (talk) 10:19, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious

The photo captioned XGA actually looks like a different variant of the XGA-2 than the one pictured below it. This is what an XGA should look like I believe. @Drahtlos: this is your picture are you positive it is an XGA? —DIYeditor (talk) 14:37, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah see also this. Shows quite a different board layout with the sockets for RAM expansion, while XGA-2 came standard will fully populated VRAM. —DIYeditor (talk) 14:43, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It said "XGA" on the card - that is all I know, I'm not an expert otherwise... Drahtlos (talk) 20:52, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gotcha. I determined that it is an XGA-2 and updated the article. Thanks. —DIYeditor (talk) 22:17, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]