Talk:False morel

Not Just Gyromitra

Corrected "False Morel" so that it no longer redirects to G. esculenta, but now has links to several species known as "False morels."

Thats actually a picture of the potentially fatal Brain Mushroom, NOT a False Morel.

The image on the False Morel page is actually a picture of the potentially fatal Brain Mushroom, NOT a False Morel.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_morel

See -

Brain Mushroom: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gyromitra_esculenta

False Morel: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verpa — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.7.110.214 (talk) 04:02, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article talks about several fungi called false morel. Gyromitra esculenta, which you call Brain Mushroom, is indeed called so. I hope the article is clear enough about them not being innocent. --LPfi (talk) 20:58, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in False morel

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of False morel's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Kuo 2007":

From Verpa bohemica: Kuo M. (2007). 100 Edible Mushrooms. Ann Arbor, Michigan: The University of Michigan Press. ISBN 978-0-472-03126-9.
From Morchella: Kuo M. (2007). 100 Edible Mushrooms. Ann Arbor, Michigan: The University of Michigan Press. pp. 55–58. ISBN 978-0-472-03126-9.

Reference named "Kuo 2005":

From Verpa bohemica: Kuo M. (2005). Morels. Ann Arbor, Michigan: The University of Michigan Press. pp. 184–5. ISBN 0-472-03036-1.
From Morchella: Kuo M. (2005). Morels. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press. p. 173. ISBN 978-0-472-03036-1.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:50, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copied text redundancies

@CaptainEek: simply copying over the section from Morchella has created a lot of redundancy in the article. Much of the information above the new section feels like it's then repeated with different wording below. Could you work on merging them into one cohesive article? -- Fyrael (talk) 15:53, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved the material from the lead into the body, and removed the one sentence I felt redundant. Otherwise, it was mostly new material. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 17:19, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]