Talk:False potto/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: – VisionHolder « talk » 20:05, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
I'm claiming this review. Comments coming shortly. – VisionHolder « talk » 20:05, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
Comments: Excellent article, and very clear to read for a taxon article with a lot of discussion of anatomy.
- Thanks. Ucucha 21:02, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
"excavation in the skull" – any alternative wording? Not a traditional statement for the people who aren't anatomists.- "Excavation" is probably not the right word. I changed it to use "depression" instead.
Nowak 1999 and Leutwyler 1996 are listed in short footnotes, but not in the "Literature cited".- Nowak added; ref = harv added for Leutwyyler.
The link to "Oates et al. 2008" doesn't work, and probably won't unless we start adding that feature to the various IUCN Red List ref templates. Personally, I just put news and web refs in the References section, then use notes for journals and books. It's up to you how you want to do it, though.- Added an anchor to fix this.
- Unfortunately, the anchor doesn't highlight the ref, but this will have to do. – VisionHolder « talk » 02:03, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
- Added an anchor to fix this.
I've never used {{Sfnm}} before, but for some reason the first short footnote in ref #17 doesn't work.- It's because I misspelled Schwartz's name as Schwarz. Fixed (also on a few other occasions).
- Funny... I could swear I checked the spelling. – VisionHolder « talk » 02:03, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
- It's because I misspelled Schwartz's name as Schwarz. Fixed (also on a few other occasions).
"citing C. Wild" – Do we have any information about who this is or what publication it's referring to?- It's a personal communication; clarified.
Other than that, it looks good to me. – VisionHolder « talk » 20:55, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Great job! Thanks for writing this primate article. – VisionHolder « talk » 02:03, 22 May 2011 (UTC)