Talk:Fat link
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 18 November 2017. The result of the discussion was merge. |
Mark for deletion: Not verifiable, not actually existing term.
Do some fucking research, kthxbye. Fixing the article which mistakenly thinks that this is a recent development.--152.78.61.132 14:20, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
new section
[edit]so. i am writing new section. it will have links to discussions about implementation, and implementation. these may include:
- http://www.oreillynet.com/xml/blog/2003/09/how_do_you_represent_onetomany.html How do you represent one-to-many links? Friday September 26, 2003 by Bob DuCharme
- http://paulherron.net/articles/view/fat_links_in_cakephp (i couldn't understand how it worked?)
- http://www.snee.com/xml/linking/1toMdemo.xml Bob DuCharme, 2003-01-18 requires javascript and doesn't work in firefox 3.x
- http://www.w3.org/TR/xlink/#extended-link is relevant as well. yay!I'm not human (talk) 04:01, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
Oh look 'ere: http://next-nexus.info/harrismw/webdev/play/fatlinks/ 'nother attempt at it. 41.204.73.115 (talk) 17:47, 27 January 2012 (UTC)