Talk:Fee (band)

The sources

• http://aaronzehr.blogspot.com/2010/07/steve-fee.html

Someone's blog, not a reliable source.

• http://echoesofthemyth.blogspot.com/2010/11/can-you-love-art-without-loving-artist.html

Someone's blog, not a reliable source.

• http://defendingcontending.com/2010/02/28/david-crowders-crowded-theology/

Makes NO MENTION AT ALL about Fee.

• http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_happened_to_the_steve_fee_band

Wikianswers is definitely not a reliable source.

• http://www.chacha.com/topic/steve-fee

ChaCha is not a reliable source. Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#ChaCha: in another editor's opinion: "It is a user-input website with no indication of editorial control, whether its contents happen to be valid or not, it is not considered reliable by WP standards." — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 17:17, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

There are multiple sources listed above and others that indicate the reason for the band break up (Steve Fee's affair). Although they may not be valid sources according to WP standards, because there are so many with consistent information, there should at least be a mention of the rumors surrounding the breakup. Instead of not mentioning it at all.192.31.106.34 (talk) 17:57, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

I second the above comment, there should be at least a mention of it. Something like "It is speculated that Steve Fee has been involved in an extramarital affair which led to the breakup." Perhaps, all of these independent blogs can be listed as source for just this statement.24.99.166.49 (talk) 03:37, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Information on the breakup:

• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LqSKwBzJ9I0
• http://thez.com/featured/a-special-message-from-steve-fee/

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:630:301:5230:41B2:2984:63A4:32B5 (talk • contribs)