Talk:Finetooth shark/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi, I have reviewed this article for GA and have made some copy edits. Please feel free to revert any copy edits with which you do not agree. I think this is a fine article and fulfills the GA criteria. —Mattisse (Talk) 18:12, 18 May 2009 (UTC) GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): Well written b (MoS): follows MoS

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable c (OR): No OR

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): Covers major areas b (focused): Remains focused on topic and presents in context

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias: NPOV

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Another good article by you. Congratulations!

—Mattisse (Talk) 18:19, 18 May 2009 (UTC)