Talk:Finn Hudson/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) – talk 06:18, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Very nice! One minor issue: The caption for File:Ryan Murphy by Gage Skidmore.jpg in the article suggests that Monteith is definitely leaving after season 3; contradictory to that discussed in the Casting and creation section. Just ammend the caption, and we're good to go :) Rcej (Robert) – talk 05:54, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I opted to remove the Ryan Murphy photo altogether along with its contradictory caption, and move the photo of Monteith from where it was to this place; it makes more sense there anyway, since the Monteith caption already talks about the same audition tape as is in the adjacent text. Please let me know if that works. Thanks! BlueMoonset (talk) 06:20, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That works for me :) Pass! Rcej (Robert) – talk 07:35, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! HorrorFan121 will be so pleased! (And I am, too.) BTW, the next Glee GAN will be for the project's 50th GA! BlueMoonset (talk) 07:39, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That should be Sue!! Seriously! Rcej (Robert) – talk 07:47, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I can see that... but I think she's going to lose this one, too. Frickative just about has "Duets" ready—an episode she doesn't even appear in!—and I'm pretty close with "Special Education". (Which, now that I think about it, is another episode without Sue. Hmm.) No one, though, is working on Sue at the moment, and the "Critical response" section is tiny and needs a lot of research and writing (preferably in that order). Hope you won't mind if the next few you see are episode articles; we still have ten more from the second season to finish up. BlueMoonset (talk) 08:15, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Results of review[edit]

GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Finn Hudson passes this review, and has been promoted to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail: Pass