Talk:Flag of Ecuador/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Aaron north (talk) 05:44, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have completed my review. This is a pretty good article that is very close to passing the GA criteria, with only one issue (either lack of citation, or editorializing). I believe this issue can be easily fixed, so I am placing this article on hold for up to 7 days. Aaron north (talk) 06:34, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good now. Aaron north (talk) 16:28, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Comments[edit]

The following is a list of concerns that I believe need to be satisfied to pass review. If you disagree or believe I made an error, please point that out too. Aaron north (talk) 06:34, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The source in the paragraph did not seem to confirm this sentence: ("They both symbolize the beauty and wealth of the respective regions (Sierra or Costa).") Without a source for the symbolism of the mountain and river, this appears to be an example of editorializing.
- I went ahead and removed that statement. I am going to fix the external links now. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 07:49, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]