Talk:Floterial district

Templates calling for additional citations

I disagree with the templates you added. The article already has plenty of footnotes, for its size, and mostly reports the law and court decisions that are cited in it. Links such as at-large (which contains a list of states that used floterial Congressional districts) and the cited chapter of the US Code are other references. If you have specific improvements, they would be welcome. Spike-from-NH (talk) 11:57, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The content looks pretty skimpy for those of us who are not Granite Staters, Spike. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:20, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Skimpiness is one thing (about which I can do little more)--insufficient citation is quite different. Again, please be specific. Spike-from-NH (talk) 20:41, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]