Talk:Foreign Policy of the National Liberation Front (Algeria)

	Algeria portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Algeria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Algeria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AlgeriaWikipedia:WikiProject AlgeriaTemplate:WikiProject AlgeriaAlgeria articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

International relations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 January 2019 and 25 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Habibaradwan1. Peer reviewers: Nchun1996.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:23, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Trevor's Peer Review

This is definitely a great start to a new article. The structure of the article provides a very nice roadmap for future additions. It makes it really simple for future editors to add their own sections on the relationship between FLN and other movements. I like how you explore your topic through multiple perspectives, showing how the FLN provided material support in certain situations and a more ideological one in others. Your sources seem very reliable and support your article well. I like how there is a consistent neutral tone throughout the article. The lead section very succinctly summarizes the three primary sections of the article. However, there are few improvements I believe could make it better. The lead could benefit from hyperlinks to terms and organizations that the reader might not be familiar with, such as "African Independence Movements." In addition, I think your hyperlinks in the latter sections should be in the lead instead, as they are brought up first. The last sentence of the lead seems a little out of place, and might be better earlier in the paragraph. Going forward, I think should also look for additional sources for each section so they don't rely too heavily on a single source. Finally, as a reader, I would like to know more about the FLN's actions within the independence movement of Algeria itself. It's sort of touched upon in the lead, but I think it could potentially have its own section. Overall, I think this a solid foundation for a new wikipedia article.

TrevorAppel (talk) 23:26, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nick's Peer Review

I think that you have a very good foundation. I like that the headings are very clear in presenting to the reader the relationships between the FLN and other independence movements in an easy-to-understand manner. Furthermore, your current organization is very well compartmentalized and easy to navigate. Also, the information in the lead section presents a good roadmap in a very neutral fashion. In terms of improvements, it might be beneficial to include some information regarding any disagreements or conflicts that emerged between the FLN and other movements (if such information exists) as it would benefit the reader to learn about the nuances of these relationships. Some additional information that I believe could strengthen your article includes some very basic background information on the FLN so that the reader is a little bit more familiar with the organization. Overall, you have a good start! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nchun1996 (talk • contribs) 05:13, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]