Talk:Frank E. Beach Memorial Fountain/GA1
GA Review[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Kingsif (talk · contribs) 18:55, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I just saw this added and am planning on reviewing it (nice, interesting) - but it just got nommed so I feel a responsibility to go do a few older noms first. Should only be a few days, if that's alright? Kingsif (talk) 18:55, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- Kingsif, No problem! I've also requested a copy edit from the Guild of Copy Editors so waiting a few days is no problem. I think the prose should be fine overall, but I always request GOCE reviews after article expansions. Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:23, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- Infobox and images good
- Reliable sources
- The Oregonian is a good source, not available but AGF
- Inline cites used well
- Perhaps move ref [3] (current) to the paragraph rather than the inscription quote? To show that it supports the preceding sentences, too
- Lead good length
- good summary
- Minor typo
at press conference
→ "at a press conference"? - Should
concrete aggregates
not be singular? - Rest looks good; well structured, neutral
- Talk and history clear - article stable
- Copyvio check clear
Overall[edit]
- on hold Only a few issues - short but sweet. Kingsif (talk) 21:18, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- Kingsif, Thanks so much! I've made these changes. ---Another Believer (Talk) 03:46, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Great, I trust your work that the coverage is not lacking, the sources also don't suggest there's anything substantial missing.
Kingsif (talk) 04:11, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Kingsif, Thanks! I checked the Oregonian archives thoroughly. ---Another Believer (Talk) 04:18, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Great, I trust your work that the coverage is not lacking, the sources also don't suggest there's anything substantial missing.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.