Talk:Funeral Blues/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 16:59, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I'll be taking a look at this article for the January 2022 GAN backlog drive. If you haven't already signed up, please feel free to join in! Although QPQ is not required, if you're feeling generous, I also have a list of GA nominations of my own right here.

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Lede

Commas around "or "Stop all the clocks""
- Added
Combine first two sentences for flow**
- Added

Writing and publication

Link verse play
"in his book" → "in his poetry collection"
- Done both

Analysis

Is there a synonym for unnecessarily corrupted rhyme that might be understood by those less versed in poetic criticism?
- tried to rephrase
""momentarily distracted by grief."" → ""momentarily distracted by grief"." per MOS:LQ
- Done

Appearances and reception

What year was the Faber and Faber collection published?
Remove the birth and death dates on Palmer per MOS:BIRTHDATE, which states birth and death details should only be included after a name if there is special contextual relevance
- Done

References

Mixed use of access date, sometimes DMY, sometimes YYYY--MM-DD
- Should be standardized Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 19:25, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

General comments

No images used, so criteria do not need to be addressed
No stability concerns in the revision history
Earwig score looks good

Putting on hold to allow nominator to address comments. Feel free to ping me with questions, and let me know when you're finished! — Ghost River 16:32, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thanks, GhostRiver, how does this look now? Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 19:25, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for making those changes. Everything looks good from my end, happy to pass! — Ghost River 22:33, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]