Talk:Gaara/GA1

GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   "Naruto Shippūden: Gekitou Ninja Taisen EX marks the first appearance of Gaara in his Part II appearance in a video game, with the second one being Naruto Shippūden: Narutimate Accel." Lose an appearance.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   I'm assuming there's no less commercial place to demonstrate the availability of merchandise than Amazon.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   One weak piece of prose shouldn't hold this back; I'm sure it will be fixed directly. Jclemens (talk) 02:04, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

   Fixed the line of prose. sephiroth bcr ^(converse) 06:25, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

   Actually, I meant the fact that the word appearance was used twice in rapid succession--once for the character's costuming, and once for the occurrence. Jclemens (talk) 06:59, 18 August 2008 (UTC)