Jump to content

Talk:Garrett's Miss Pawhuska/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    See below for suggestions.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Offline sources accepted in good faith, and the online source checks out. You might consider linking directly to the PDF; I had to search for the link to the article about the horse.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    I'm glad you didn't use the "gentle and kind" language the online source uses.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    In the non-free rationale, the article is listed as "Garrett's Miss Pawhusak"; I assume this is just a typo, but if it's not, I want to bring it to your attention.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
  • The early life section where you talk about the lineage using multiple "by"s might cause a little confusion.
  • I don't think you need the clause about how her first race was delayed ... it doesn't add anything to her story, IMHO.
  • What does it mean to "slip" a foal?
  • You had "the Garrett's ranch", but I wasn't sure if it was just Dee Garrett or the entire family. Since the article talks about several family members, I changed it to Garretts'. JKBrooks85 (talk) 23:35, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]