Jump to content

Talk:Geastrum pectinatum/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi, this is a good article, as it meets all the GA criteria. I altered one wikilink, relinking it to another word, as it redirected to the opposite meaning. That's it! —Mattisse (Talk) 20:45, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): The article is very well written in prose that takes some concentration but given that, it is clear. b (MoS): Follows MoS
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable c (OR): No OR
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): Covers all the major areas b (focused): Remains focused on the topic
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias: Neutral
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.: Stable
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

This is an excellent article on the subject. Congratulations!

Mattisse (Talk) 20:45, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]