Talk:Georges-Antoine Belcourt/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lemurbaby (talk) 15:04, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Comments

1. Arctic, thanks for your hard work on making the previous reviewer's recommended changes. I know you were great with turning things around quickly with the Education in Malta article so it not getting passed the first time was just a fluke of crossed schedules. My job here is easy: pass. -- Lemurbaby (talk) 15:04, 12 February 2011 (UTC)