Talk:German cruiser Prinz Eugen/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: User:Canpark

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   The article is very well written, and is clearly compliant of MoS guidelines.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   References are used appropriately throughout the article, and the notes are particularly useful.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   The ship's specifications, service history pre-1945 and post 1945 are well covered.

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   This is an excellent article about a battleship, which is well referenced and enjoyable to read. I am happy to pass this article.Canpark (talk) 15:13, 3 August 2011 (UTC)