Talk:Granuloma annulare

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

note[edit]

- pretty sure the included image is not granuloma annulare; it could be dyshidrotic eczema possibly, but it otherwise looks nothing like the dozens of other examples of images of granuloma annulare available online. Perhaps someone more familiar with these lesions can confirm this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.48.206.27 (talk) 02:25, 9 October 2012 (UTC) -looking online this is the only picture that looks like this and all the others look the same. GA is not rare or even "fairly rare." Most online medical sources describe it as more or less common. Senn590 (talk) 12:32, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely not a photo of granuloma annulare. It is also not limited to a 2 year span. Much newer information now on line. I actually belong to an online help group. This now effects thousands of people of all ages and countries. Still no cure but many different treatments. 199.27.156.246 (talk) 00:04, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]