Talk:Grave Danger/merge archive

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  • merge makes sense to avoid 3 entries for 2 episodes. Unless it is decided that we should just have one entry for both I suppose. (Emperor 23:47, 14 June 2007 (UTC))[reply]
  • Merge into Grave Danger (CSI episode) (which would be the correct title). It's a two-parter, but as notability goes, they go hand in hand as one episode -- Ipstenu (talkcontribs) 00:49, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • merge per Ipstenu's suggestion: 1 article, links on episode lists can be piped to the correct sections for the articles e.g. [[Grave Danger#Part 1|Grave Danger: Part 1]]. I'm going to knock something up on a user subpage here. Editus Reloaded 11:26, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I have added the delightful image of intestines here because I am drafting a new, merged article and need somewhere in articlespace to put it. Editus Reloaded 14:19, 15 June 2007 (UTC) Ditto morgue sceneEditus Reloaded 16:20, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good. Rather than piping it might be better to do with a redirect on the individual entries page. Also to clarify my vote I agree with the merge of the others inot here moved to this address: Grave Danger (CSI episode). Seems like a consensus? (Emperor 13:52, 16 June 2007 (UTC))[reply]
Agreed, then. Redirects from the individual articles to he relevant sections of this one. As you say, this seems like a consensus so I will do that now. BTW, opinions on the new version of this page? Editus Reloaded 14:21, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge completed some time ago, to 1 article. Editus Reloaded 15:36, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]