Talk:Gyalpo spirits

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Tibetan Buddhism (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is part of WikiProject Tibet:Tibetan Buddhism, an attempt to improve content and create better coordination between articles related to traditional religion, cultural practices and customs in Tibet. Please participate in improvement by editing Gyalpo spirits and related pages, or visit the WikiProject Tibet main page for more details on the projects. WikiProject icon
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 

Please don't add your own opinions[edit]

User: Asasjdgavjhg, please make sure your edits are WP:NPOV, not your own opinions; and make sure that what you say is sourced. On a similar point, please don't undo other sourced edits or alter them to change their meaning. (Truthbody (talk) 16:23, 27 April 2009 (UTC))

Moved article[edit]

I have moved the article from Gyalpo, which just means "King", to Gyalpo spirits which is what this article is actually about. I have also deleted the irelevent section "Other uses" that was there - as under this one could with equal justification include someting of every occurence of a translation into Tibetan of the Word "raja" - It is already perfectly clear from the opening para of the article that "Gyalpo" has other uses. Lodru (talk) 04:34, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Lodru, while you're at it, what do you think about merging the orphaned Gyalpo Sum article to this one? Emptymountains (talk) 04:50, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Done. Lodru (talk) 08:26, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Primary vs. Secondary Sources[edit]

Dear Yongten, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia based on secondary sources; as such, I do not have to provide the primary sources as you are requesting. That's not my job as a Wikipedia editor, as per wp:primary which states: "All interpretive claims, analyses, or synthetic claims about primary sources must be referenced to a secondary source, rather than original analysis of the primary-source material by Wikipedia editors." Emptymountains (talk) 19:50, 26 November 2009 (UTC)