Talk:HD 110082 b
Appearance
![]() | This redirect was nominated at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion on 28 January 2023. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Proposed merge of HD 110082 b with List of exoplanets discovered in 2021
[edit]It's just another exoplanet, and there's probably nothing notable about it. The source does not show notability. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 21:14, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose The original source is secondary, therefore together with primary ref i provided the notability criteria are meet. Please also note what moving and deleting pages you did not create is likely to suffer from knowledge bias.Trurle (talk) 23:34, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
- You have a point, but what's special about it?🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 00:48, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- "Special" is a definition subject to knowledge bias, therefore classifying anything as "special" or "ordinary" (especially without consulting author of content) will likely violate Wikipedia:Neutral point of view which is (unlike notability) is one of policy pillars of wikipedia.Trurle (talk) 08:18, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
- That's not what I mean. I mean, what features does it have? 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 15:11, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
- "Special" is a definition subject to knowledge bias, therefore classifying anything as "special" or "ordinary" (especially without consulting author of content) will likely violate Wikipedia:Neutral point of view which is (unlike notability) is one of policy pillars of wikipedia.Trurle (talk) 08:18, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
The only unique features about the planet is that it’s larger than most sub-Neptunes, and is located in a new association. Other than that, it’s just another exoplanet. 400Weir (talk) 15:11, 29 July 2021 (UTC)