Talk:HMCS Regina (K234)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk · contribs) 22:43, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I will be quick failing this article. First of all, you have made zero edits to the article and I do not believe you have the capacity to make the required changes to make this article B-Class, nevermind GA-Class. That said, the article fails criteria 3 of the GA criteria: "it addresses the main aspects of the topic". The entire general charactistics section is not cited nor are the characteristics discussed in any form in the text of the article. A large addition to the article would have to be made to include characteristics, design, and more in depth construction details for Regina. Some other points that are quite obvious:

The lede is severely insufficient and contains information not present in the main text
"War service" includes uncited information
Reference #1 is not reliable and is also broken
Reference #2 is not reliable
Reference #7 cites the fact that the class was named after flowering plants in the RN to no less than 18 separate pages which is ludicrous
Reference #9 is a controversial and usually unreliable source
The entire final paragraph is cited to reference #11 which is a link to a PDF describing a TV series with no details on Regina or particular reliability

Thanks, Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 22:43, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]