Talk:HMS Ben-my-Chree/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 10:08, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

I'll do this one.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   1) To the Dardanelles: "Flight Lieutenant George Dacre accompanied Edmonds on his flight..." It is not entirely clear if Dacre was Edmond's observer or was flying the other Short 184; the sentence suggests the former in the way it is phrased, but in the following sentences it appears Dacre's plane was the one suffering engine problems.
   2) The infobox and body of article is inconsistent with her length (in feet) when in military service.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

I have done a quick pass over of the text, and fixed the odd typo. I also rephrased a few things for sake of clarity. Other than the comments above, this is all good. Zawed (talk) 10:08, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Both issues fixed. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:29, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Looks good, updated criteria met and passing for GA. Zawed (talk) 04:18, 29 March 2013 (UTC)