Talk:HMS Resistance (1861)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 10:01, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- A few duplicate links: muzzle velocity, bulkhead, wrought iron
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- No citation errors noted.
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
- a (tagged and captioned): b (Is illustrated with appropriate images): c (non-free images have fair use rationales): d public domain pictures appropriately demonstrate why they are public domain:
- Appropriate tags used for images.
- Overall:
- a Pass/Fail:
Only issue noted is with duplicate links. Otherwise, all good. Zawed (talk) 10:01, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- All fixed. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:54, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- Passed as GA. Zawed (talk) 10:59, 4 May 2013 (UTC)