Talk:HMS Romney (1762)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:39, 24 October 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   I'm not used to seeing "in Ordinary" capitalized in modern histories.

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   Places of publication for all references would be nice, but not required.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   Is Romney named for anything? Link Captain, Rear-Admiral and Vice-Admiral. Fix the red link in the infobox.

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Issues fixed. For the name, I presume it's named for the Earl of Romney, but can't find a cite for that. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 23:18, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Quite likely, but as it's unconfirmed...--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:33, 24 October 2010 (UTC)