Talk:HTC One (M7)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Numbermaniac (talk · contribs) 22:46, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

I'm seeing this as almost certainly a good article.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

All this needs is some references where the cn tags are added, and the article can be made a GA. -- ^(T) Numbermaniac _(C) 09:58, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Done. ViperSnake151  Talk  18:03, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

That was anazingly quick. Alright, a GA I think this can be! -- ^(T) Numbermaniac _(C) 00:10, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

It is now a GA! -- ^(T) Numbermaniac _(C) 00:16, 8 June 2013 (UTC)