Talk:Happy Ending (Schitt's Creek)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Kncny11 (talk · contribs) 17:44, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Hey there! I'll be taking a look at this. Any section with a Working tag means I haven't finished looking at it yet, but feel free to start making changes as soon as they come! Kncny11 (shoot) 17:44, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
Infobox and lede
[edit]- The photo caption says "David and Patrick", but in the photo itself, Patrick is on the left. Either switching the names or indicating (left) and (right) would help.
- The one-hour documentary is mentioned in the lede but nowhere in the body.
Synopsis
[edit]- The synopsis is short, but the plot of this episode is fairly thin. The only thing I would add is that the original officiant cancels, and Moira has to fill in.
Production
[edit]- that Deadline Hollywood reference doesn't seem to match up with what the sentence says. The WP article says that the series started airing on Pop TV with its fifth season, while DH mentions seasons 4 and 3
- remove comma after "sixth"
- Pipe Hockley Valley to Mono, Ontario, which encompasses Hockley
Reception
[edit]- Italicize IndieWire
References
[edit]- Ref [23], IndieWire, should be marked as "work" and not "publisher", as the publisher would be the Penske Media Corporation.
- Refs [11] and [17], both Vulture, should be marked with "|url-access=limited", because /shakes fist at paywall
General
[edit]- Article edit history is stable.
- Earwig copyvio score came back high, but the offender is clearly a mirror site, so I am unbothered.
- One free use image at the top, appropriately labeled, and an appropriate CC image in the body.
Final comments
[edit]A quick, pleasant read! Biggest two things are really the fact that the documentary is not mentioned in the body, and that one Deadline Hollywood reference. I'll put the article On hold until everything has been addressed! Kncny11 (shoot) 18:12, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Kncny11: All done. Thanks for the review.
Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 18:22, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Some Dude From North Carolina: Looks good! Thanks for getting those fixes in so quickly, and I'll pass it now. Kncny11 (shoot) 18:29, 10 March 2021 (UTC)