Talk:Harmondsworth Great Barn/GA1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: DavidCane (talk · contribs) 12:42, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

  • Review underway, comments following later.--DavidCane (talk) 12:42, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Nicely constructed. I have added some links to architectural terms
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    There is one deadlink which needs to be fixed - nr 15.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Covers all the main points.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Pass.--DavidCane (talk) 01:21, 17 December 2012 (UTC)