Jump to content

Talk:Hells Bells (cave formations)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: I'll take this one. Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 08:17, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]

This is a well-written article (and a great title), and it is reliably sourced.

  • The sources are nearly all the Stinnesbecks and colleagues; I guess this is largely unavoidable but it would be nice to have some use made of Ritter's paper, since it's directly on the topic and presumably has something to say in its 20 pages. For instance he mentions pH ...
    Um, isn't Ritter the video? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:21, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ah yes, I saw the video but clicked on a DOI link and must have gone back to one of the Stinnesbeck papers.
Well the spelling was wrong even if you like the verb.
Yes, I was more referring to removing the "hovering" altogether. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:36, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I do rather sympathise with the reasoning, but it would look tidier if you put it there all the same.
I don't think it would be tidier to having a mixed-formatting sources list. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:46, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Erm, ok, but you currently have a mixed-format reflist: you're lucky I'm rather relaxed about such things.

I think we'll stop here. The article is well up to the required standard. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:50, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]