Talk:Historic conservatism in New Zealand
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Party metadata
[edit]Conservative — political party metadata | |||
Color | Shading | Shortname | |
#9999CC | #FFE4B5 | [[Template:Conservative (New Zealand)/meta/shortname|{{Conservative (New Zealand)/meta/shortname}}]] |
Opposition/Conservative
[edit]Carrying on from the proposal here I guess the talk page for this new article would be a better place for it. Doing further research on the topic it seems that using conservative would be more suited than opposition as far as generic terms go. Looking at sources from parliament itself and their library as well as Wilson's New Zealand Parliamentary Record the term Conservative is used by all. Given where this information is coming from it seems that if we want to be as correct as we can, then using the terminology parliament itself uses is probably something we should look at. If their classifications aren't the correct ones to use, then I really don't what are. Kiwichris (talk) 07:29, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Expansion
[edit]Hi there, I plan to expand this article to include more content on the Reform Party as well as the modern New Zealand National Party and other smaller parties and groups. I will consult several scholarly sources including Te Ara, Michael King's The Penguin History of New Zealand, Barry Gustafson's The First 50 Years: A History of the New Zealand National Party and Colin James' National at 80: The Story of the New Zealand National Party. Gustafson and James describe National as having both conservative and liberal elements. In the long-term, I plan to rename the article Conservatism in New Zealand, similar to the Conservatism in Australia and Conservatism in the United Kingdom articles. Let me know what you think. Andykatib 11:08, 30 January 2022 (UTC) I Agree. Change the name of the page. Muaza Husni (talk) 12:30, 20 October 2024 (UTC)