Talk:History of microeconomics

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Incentive#Problems|problems with incentive structures]] The anchor (#Problems) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Change title to History of[edit]

"Evolution" should be associated with biological aspects, so this articles should be a history of... Dpleibovitz (talk) 21:00, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

History of microeconomics seems to be the best solution. Compare History of macroeconomic thought.--Tim Stamper (talk) 02:21, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Excessive quotations[edit]

The article consists primarily of long block quotes, which seems inappropriate and also rather unreadable. They quotes should be cut down and paraphrased per the Manual of Style MOS:QUOTE. Banks Irk (talk) 17:42, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]